Answer:The president has influence over the course of the U.S. economy, but less than is generally supposed and certainly far less than presidents themselves like to claim, especially when the economy is doing well.
You often hear them saying, for example, "My administration created 20 million new jobs in the last seven years." Presidents don't create jobs; real people taking risks and investing their own money are the ones who actually do that. Nonetheless, the federal government is such a huge factor in our economy today that a president who is successful at shaping or shifting the government's policies can certainly have a great deal of impact.
The president can set a tone that is either hostile or friendly to free enterprise. If he whips up anti-business sentiment or convinces Congress to raise taxes, hike tariffs, pile on more regulations, or otherwise create a hostile environment, the result will be negative for the economy. People will hold back on starting businesses or investing in expansion, or they will put their money to work in other countries.
If, on the other hand, the president sets a friendly tone, works to cut taxes and tariffs and eases the burdens of regulation and other government interference, he can benefit the economy by unleashing the creative energies of investors, entrepreneurs and consumers.
In either event, Congress still plays a pivotal role because the president can't unilaterally raise or lower taxes and tariffs. The Congress ultimately controls the purse strings of the federal government, so whether the government has a balanced budget or not is a congressional prerogative. A president who wields no clout on Capitol Hill will have less ability to influence the economy than has the Congress.
No matter what the president or the Congress do, however, the Federal Reserve has perhaps the greatest ability to influence the economy. Even a president who encourages enterprise and a Congress that cuts taxes and tariffs will be thwarted if the Fed is pursuing monetary policy that is harmful--and it can pursue any number of harmful policies, such as being too tight or too loose with money and credit.
I feel that the idea of time is such a significance to him as a picture taker since he needs to utilize his chance astutely. On the off chance that he would have been taking a photo of a creature in the wild he would need to utilize his chance productively on the off chance that he needed to get the ideal shot.
b. It is a political contribution not regulated by federal law.
In 1974 the Federal Election Campaign Act limited the quantity of money that individuals could donate to a particular candidate. This produced the so-called Soft Money which are contributions to a political party (not candidate) and the use of such money is hardly regulated by the law.
A. Develop a Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) to proceed with the project
A project charter can be defined as a small document that often describes the over all objectives and goals of a project, the roles and responsibilities, how the project will be carried out including the person that will be in charge of the project.
A project charter is important because it helps to outlines a project in an organization and It is an essential tool for planning and executing a project.
Therefore work breakdown structure is the most important of the Project Charter because it helps to define the work of the project and also to develop the project's schedule which in turn help the project managers gain a useful summary of the project and how to achieve.
Therefore project charter play an important roles by authorizing the project manager to begin the project by using organisational resources to achieve the goals and objectives of the project.